On this challenge, we were tasked with trying to launch two carts with different spring constants at the same velocity. To do this we had to thoroughly understand the conceptual elements of energy conservation.
We began by determining the energy conservation equation.
Eel = Ek
We then manipulated the equation:
1/2kx^2 = 1/2mv^2
Through given information and initial calculations, we gathered the following information:
Red Spring Constant: 84Nm
Blue Spring Constant: 112Nm
Mass of cart: .542Kg
We knew that we had to get the same velocity for both carts so we decided to use .5m/s for our intended velocity. From there it was a plug and chug problem for both carts to find the x value.
Red Cart:
1/2kx^2 = 1/2mv^2
1/2(84)x^2 = 1/2(.542)(.5)^2
x^2 = .0016
x = 4cm
Blue Cart:
1/2kx^2 = 1/2mv^2
1/2(112)x^2 = 1/2(.542)(.5)^2
x^2 = .012
x = 3.5cm
From here, we tested our predictions on the track. The velocity of the red cart was .44m/s and the blue cart was .45m/s. These numbers left us with just a 2% margin of error, one of our lowest ones yet!
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Friday, April 15, 2016
Rocket Projectile Practicum Post
Experiment:
Our task was to take a rocket and predict where it will land using our formulas from our unit on projectile motion.
Materials:
Rocket
Angles
Bike Pump
Steps:
1. We found the actual velocity of the rocket by testing it at a different angle and seeing how far it went. We worked backwards using trigonometric ratios.
2. We started with an angle of 25 degrees and found that the actual velocity of the rocket at the time of takeoff was 19.92m/s.
3. We then could predict the time using the viy (from the new angle (40 degrees)) and the equation
x = 1/2at^2+vit
We found the time as 3.114s
4. We next found the change in position using equation Vx = (change in) x/ t
Change in position: 39.87m
Conclusions:
The actual position of the rocket was 32.9m. We were somewhat off in our calculations, but I think it was because of the wind on the day that we first tested. If the wind speed had been constant, I believe that our prediction would have been correct.
Our task was to take a rocket and predict where it will land using our formulas from our unit on projectile motion.
Materials:
Rocket
Angles
Bike Pump
Steps:
1. We found the actual velocity of the rocket by testing it at a different angle and seeing how far it went. We worked backwards using trigonometric ratios.
2. We started with an angle of 25 degrees and found that the actual velocity of the rocket at the time of takeoff was 19.92m/s.
3. We then could predict the time using the viy (from the new angle (40 degrees)) and the equation
x = 1/2at^2+vit
We found the time as 3.114s
4. We next found the change in position using equation Vx = (change in) x/ t
Change in position: 39.87m
Conclusions:
The actual position of the rocket was 32.9m. We were somewhat off in our calculations, but I think it was because of the wind on the day that we first tested. If the wind speed had been constant, I believe that our prediction would have been correct.
| This is a picture of the calculations I took |
Unknown Mass Cart Practicum
Procedure:
The task of our group was to try and find the mass of an object placed on a cart using our momentum equations. We were given a cart, a bag of salt (unknown mass), and capstone sensors.
Steps:
1. We knew that the mass of the empty cart was 0.5kg (Ma). We then measured the velocity of the cart so we found the Va.
2. From here we found the velocity of the cart with the bag of salt. (Vab)
3. Using the law of conservation of momentum.
mava + mbvb = (ma + mb)(Vab)
Evaluation and Manipulation of Data:
pbefore = pafter
mava + mbvb = (ma + mb)(Vab)
The task of our group was to try and find the mass of an object placed on a cart using our momentum equations. We were given a cart, a bag of salt (unknown mass), and capstone sensors.
Steps:
1. We knew that the mass of the empty cart was 0.5kg (Ma). We then measured the velocity of the cart so we found the Va.
2. From here we found the velocity of the cart with the bag of salt. (Vab)
3. Using the law of conservation of momentum.
mava + mbvb = (ma + mb)(Vab)
Evaluation and Manipulation of Data:
| Diagram of our experiment. Drawing courtesy of Miranda Thompson (a group member) |
pbefore = pafter
mava + mbvb = (ma + mb)(Vab)
(0.5)(0.57) + (mb)(0) = (0.5 + mb)(0.24)
(0.28)+ 0 = .12 + .24mb
.28 - .12 = .24mb
.16 = .24mb
mb = .66kg
Conclusions:
The actual weight was .77kg, so we were a little off, but I think it's mostly due to lack of time to do a lot of trials for the velocity before and after. We took the average of 3 trial runs when calculating the velocity.
Tuesday, February 16, 2016
Properties of Projectiles
Overview:
We started a new unit with an introductory experiment. The experiment was simply to throw a ball forward and upward, and take a video. From there, we uploaded the video to a program called PascoCapstone. We tracked the ball's motion while in the air and then were able to find some key characteristics of projectile motion. The main thing that we discovered was that the motion in the horizontal direction is completely independent from the motion in the vertical direction.
Graphs/Raw Data:
Analysis of Data:
With the information that these graphs have given, we can manipulate the data to find certain unknowns.
Acceleration in y axis: 9.8m/s^2 -- We know this because on earth the force of gravity is always the same.
Acceleration in x axis: 0 m/s^2 -- We know this because there is no unbalanced force to accelerate the ball in the horizontal direction. It is at constant velocity.
Initial velocity in y: ~2.1m/s -- We know this because its the y intercept of the vertical plane
Initial velocity in x: 3.88m/s -- We know this because it is the y-intercept for the horizontal plane
Velocity at the top of the path on y axis: 0m/s^2 -- We know this because the ball is changing direction and stops momentarily.
Velocity at the top of the path on x axis: 3.8m/s -- constant velocity
Final Velocity in x: 2.2 m/s -- final point on v vs. t graph
Final Velocity in y: -0.5m/s -- final point on v vs. t graph
How High the ball got: 2.53m -- we can look on the x vs. t graph
How far the ball went: 3.05m -- I used Xfinal - Xinitial = Change in X
Time for the ball to reach the top of its path: 0.835s -- Used equation Vf=at+Vi
Total air time for ball: 1.57s -- x=1/2at^2+vit
Conclusions:
In this experiment, we learned that the vertical and horizontal motions are completely unrelated when dealing with projectiles. We also discovered that all horizontal motion was constant, so we could use formulas and equations from the BFPM unit. The vertical motion was all constant acceleration; we used the UFPM equations. The same principle applied for solving for displacement. The horizontal motion remained constant for the entire trip and the vertical motion stopped at the top of the path. Furthermore, we were able to use the graphs that we created to find many of the unknowns, which proved to be helpful.
We started a new unit with an introductory experiment. The experiment was simply to throw a ball forward and upward, and take a video. From there, we uploaded the video to a program called PascoCapstone. We tracked the ball's motion while in the air and then were able to find some key characteristics of projectile motion. The main thing that we discovered was that the motion in the horizontal direction is completely independent from the motion in the vertical direction.
Graphs/Raw Data:
![]() |
| This image shows the path of the ball that we threw. The red plus signs show the position of the ball. |
![]() |
| This graph shows the position of the ball vs the time. The red line is the horizontal displacement, and the green line is the vertical displacement. |
![]() |
| This graph shows the velocity of the ball vs. the time. The pink line shows the velocity of the Y-axis. The blue line shows the velocity of the X-axis. |
Analysis of Data:
With the information that these graphs have given, we can manipulate the data to find certain unknowns.
Acceleration in y axis: 9.8m/s^2 -- We know this because on earth the force of gravity is always the same.
Acceleration in x axis: 0 m/s^2 -- We know this because there is no unbalanced force to accelerate the ball in the horizontal direction. It is at constant velocity.
Initial velocity in y: ~2.1m/s -- We know this because its the y intercept of the vertical plane
Initial velocity in x: 3.88m/s -- We know this because it is the y-intercept for the horizontal plane
Velocity at the top of the path on y axis: 0m/s^2 -- We know this because the ball is changing direction and stops momentarily.
Velocity at the top of the path on x axis: 3.8m/s -- constant velocity
Final Velocity in x: 2.2 m/s -- final point on v vs. t graph
Final Velocity in y: -0.5m/s -- final point on v vs. t graph
How High the ball got: 2.53m -- we can look on the x vs. t graph
How far the ball went: 3.05m -- I used Xfinal - Xinitial = Change in X
Time for the ball to reach the top of its path: 0.835s -- Used equation Vf=at+Vi
Total air time for ball: 1.57s -- x=1/2at^2+vit
Conclusions:
In this experiment, we learned that the vertical and horizontal motions are completely unrelated when dealing with projectiles. We also discovered that all horizontal motion was constant, so we could use formulas and equations from the BFPM unit. The vertical motion was all constant acceleration; we used the UFPM equations. The same principle applied for solving for displacement. The horizontal motion remained constant for the entire trip and the vertical motion stopped at the top of the path. Furthermore, we were able to use the graphs that we created to find many of the unknowns, which proved to be helpful.
Friday, February 12, 2016
UFPM Practicum Lab
Goal:
The purpose of this lab was to test our knowledge of unbalanced forces and our applied use of kinematics. We demonstrated these skills with this lab. Our goal was to try and land a weight attached to a cart on another cart below going at constant velocity.
Procedure:
We first found the mass of the entire system. 0.693kg (We rounded to .64kg)
We then solved for acceleration. (The weight was .5N)
After, we found the distance from the starting position of the weight to where it would land on the cart. The distance was .74m.
Using the information that we now had, we were able to solve using a formula for time.
Next, using the formula V=(change in)x/(change in)t we found the velocity of the cart on the ground. We concluded that the cart went 1 meter in 3.6 seconds. We manipulated these numbers to find that the cart had a constant velocity of .28m/s. Using these equations we hypothesized that if we placed the constant velocity cart 0.38m away from the weight. We could release both at the same time and the weight would land on top of the cart.
After our initial test, we proved our hypothesis correct and were able to land the weight perfectly on top of the cart.
We filmed our test which can be seen HERE.
The purpose of this lab was to test our knowledge of unbalanced forces and our applied use of kinematics. We demonstrated these skills with this lab. Our goal was to try and land a weight attached to a cart on another cart below going at constant velocity.
Procedure:
We first found the mass of the entire system. 0.693kg (We rounded to .64kg)
We then solved for acceleration. (The weight was .5N)
a=Fnet/m
a=.5N/.64kg
a=0.78m/s^2
After, we found the distance from the starting position of the weight to where it would land on the cart. The distance was .74m.
Using the information that we now had, we were able to solve using a formula for time.
x=1/2at^2+Vit
(.74)=1/2(.78)(t)^2
1.89=t^2
t=1.37s
Next, using the formula V=(change in)x/(change in)t we found the velocity of the cart on the ground. We concluded that the cart went 1 meter in 3.6 seconds. We manipulated these numbers to find that the cart had a constant velocity of .28m/s. Using these equations we hypothesized that if we placed the constant velocity cart 0.38m away from the weight. We could release both at the same time and the weight would land on top of the cart.
After our initial test, we proved our hypothesis correct and were able to land the weight perfectly on top of the cart.
We filmed our test which can be seen HERE.
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Fan Car Acceleration Experiment
Overview:
The purpose of this lab was to take two fan powered cars with different accelerations going in different directions, and try and predict where and when they would collide.
Materials:
The purpose of this lab was to take two fan powered cars with different accelerations going in different directions, and try and predict where and when they would collide.
Materials:
- Fan Powered Car
- Stop Watch
- Meter measuring stick
- chalk
Procedure:
We started the lab by finding the acceleration of our car. We did this by marking the displacement of the car at each second of motion. We then shared our data with another group so we could calculate the point of intersection. Once we compared data, we manipulated the accelerations to find where and when the two cars would collide.
Raw Data:
Time Their Data Our Data
Manipulated Data:
![]() |
| Here is the position vs time graph for the two cars |
Summary:
We collaborated with Miranda and Morgan's group to find the position and time of intersection. They were our partner group, so we were able to use the same test and the same numbers as them. We ended up being within the allowed 5% error margin at the end of the experiment.
Prediction:
Time: ~2.5 seconds
Position: ~61 cm
Actual:
Time: 2.9 seconds
Postion: 63 cm
Sunday, December 6, 2015
Forces: Challenge Lab
Introduction:
In this lab, we tried to find the weight of an object based on the tension of the wire that was holding it up.
Data:
We used trigonometric ratios to find the unknown tensions.
Cos58 = fty1 / 1.6
-> fty1 = 0.85N
Cos22 = fty2 / 3.5
-> fty2 = 3.25N
With these tensions, I concluded that the weight of the object must have been 4N. I was correct.
In this lab, we tried to find the weight of an object based on the tension of the wire that was holding it up.
Data:
We used trigonometric ratios to find the unknown tensions.
![]() |
| FBD for the experiment |
Cos58 = fty1 / 1.6
-> fty1 = 0.85N
Cos22 = fty2 / 3.5
-> fty2 = 3.25N
With these tensions, I concluded that the weight of the object must have been 4N. I was correct.
Unit 3 Summary: CAPM
Introduction:
This unit, our class learned about constant acceleration, and created the Constant Velocity Particle Model.
Instantaneous Velocity:
1. The first way of finding the instantaneous velocity is to determine the slope of the tangent to an x vs. t graph at a given point.
2. The second way is to use the mathematical model:
vf=at+vi
(Final Velocity = acceleration * time + Initial Velocity)
Two graphs depicting velocity vs. time and position vs. time
Displacement:
1. The first way of finding the displacement of an object is to find the area under a V vs. T curve. This process is demonstrated in the V vs T graph above.
2. The second way is to use the mathematical model:
x = 1/2at^2 + vit
(positon = 1/2 acceleration * time squared + initial velocity * time)
Acceleration:
1. The first way of finding the acceleration of an object is to find the slope of a v vs. t graph
2. Using the mathematical model:
a = change in v / change in t
3. Solving for acceleration in the mathematical model:
x = 1/2at^2 + vit
(positon = 1/2 acceleration * time squared + initial velocity * time)
4. Solving for acceleration in the mathematical model:
vf=at+vi
(Final Velocity = acceleration * time + Initial Velocity)
x vs. t graphs:
1. With a position vs. time graph, you can find the starting position, direction of motion, and velocity. You can also use the graph to draw a v vs. t graph or an a vs. t graph.
2. You can use the information to draw a motion map
3. You can determine the average and instantaneous velocity (as mentioned above).
4. You can determine the displacement (as mentioned above)
| The x vs. t graphs are showing constant acceleration |
1. With a velocity vs. time graph, you can find the acceleration (explained above), and find the direction of motion (positive or negative slope).
2. You can use it to draw an x vs. t graph
3. You can use it to draw an a vs. t graph
4. You can use it to draw a motion map (with velocity and acceleration vectors
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
CAPM Challenge - Rolling Ball Acceleration
Introduction:
For this challenge, our physics class was tasked with finding the acceleration of a ball rolling down a table. We were allowed to use a ball, chalk, and a ruler. We also had to fined the instantaneous velocity of the ball at 4 seconds.
Procedure:
We are going to have a ball on the table(inclined). We will mark the position of the ball at each half second with the chalk and will measure with the ruler. We predicted that there will be a constant acceleration of the ball.
Raw Data:
This data came from an average of three trials, and is converted from originally cm to m.
Time(s) Position(m)
.5 .056
1 .148
1.5 .283
2 .466
2.5 .682
3 .905
Evaluation of Data:
Originally, we found the x vs. t graph, but we changed it to be x vs. t^2 because that linearized the graph and gave us the equation for the line. We used this data to find the acceleration of the ball. Our equation from the x vs. t^2 Graph was:
Position=.0973(time)+.0546
We were able to use this equation to find our predicted acceleration of the ball.
Acceleration = 0.1946 m/s^2
For this challenge, our physics class was tasked with finding the acceleration of a ball rolling down a table. We were allowed to use a ball, chalk, and a ruler. We also had to fined the instantaneous velocity of the ball at 4 seconds.
Procedure:
We are going to have a ball on the table(inclined). We will mark the position of the ball at each half second with the chalk and will measure with the ruler. We predicted that there will be a constant acceleration of the ball.
Raw Data:
This data came from an average of three trials, and is converted from originally cm to m.
Time(s) Position(m)
.5 .056
1 .148
1.5 .283
2 .466
2.5 .682
3 .905
Evaluation of Data:
Originally, we found the x vs. t graph, but we changed it to be x vs. t^2 because that linearized the graph and gave us the equation for the line. We used this data to find the acceleration of the ball. Our equation from the x vs. t^2 Graph was:
Position=.0973(time)+.0546
We were able to use this equation to find our predicted acceleration of the ball.
Acceleration = 0.1946 m/s^2
![]() |
| This graph shows the position vs. time^2 graph after we manipulated the data |
![]() |
| This graph shows the position vs. time from our raw data. |
Conclusions:
From this lab we have used our learning from class, and applied it to the real world. We took data using only a ball, a ruler and chalk, and were able to calculate the acceleration of the ball. Our error margin was within ten percent also, which shows our knowledge of this material.
Thursday, November 5, 2015
Unit 2 Summary: Forces
Introduction and Newton's First Law:
We started this unit with an experiment where we rode on a hovercraft and pushed bowling balls with brooms. While these experiments were fun, they also taught us about the topic of our upcoming unit: Forces. Our class began by riding on the hovercraft. We quickly realized that once we were in motion, we kept moving at a constant velocity until someone stopped us. There were no forces acting on us when we were on the hovercraft. The same principles applied to the bowling ball experiment. We began by pushing the ball with a broom, and we found that the ball would keep rolling indefinitely unless we changed its direction or stopped it with the broom. These two experiments demonstrated Newton's First Law.
Newton's First Law:
An object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. It may be seen as a statement about inertia, that objects will remain in their state of motion unless a force acts to change the motion.
Free Body Diagrams:
One of our new models that we developed over the course of the unit was the free body diagram. This diagram shows the direction of all forces acting on an object. If the object is moving at constant velocity or is at rest, the two opposite forces will be equal. If the object is gaining speed, losing speed, or changing direction, the forces will be unbalanced. The forces will also appear on an x and y axis.
Types of Forces:
Real World Application:
This example shows a climber on the side of a mountain, repelling down. The forces in this example are the force pull or tension on the rope and the force gravity in the vertical direction. Also, the climber has his foot against the mountain which is creating a friction force that opposes the force of gravity. There is a normal force on his foot from the mountain.
Force Formulas:
The first formula that we learned was for converting between Mass and weight
We started this unit with an experiment where we rode on a hovercraft and pushed bowling balls with brooms. While these experiments were fun, they also taught us about the topic of our upcoming unit: Forces. Our class began by riding on the hovercraft. We quickly realized that once we were in motion, we kept moving at a constant velocity until someone stopped us. There were no forces acting on us when we were on the hovercraft. The same principles applied to the bowling ball experiment. We began by pushing the ball with a broom, and we found that the ball would keep rolling indefinitely unless we changed its direction or stopped it with the broom. These two experiments demonstrated Newton's First Law.
Newton's First Law:
An object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. It may be seen as a statement about inertia, that objects will remain in their state of motion unless a force acts to change the motion.
One of our new models that we developed over the course of the unit was the free body diagram. This diagram shows the direction of all forces acting on an object. If the object is moving at constant velocity or is at rest, the two opposite forces will be equal. If the object is gaining speed, losing speed, or changing direction, the forces will be unbalanced. The forces will also appear on an x and y axis.
![]() |
| The Free Body Diagram pictured above is balanced, meaning it is at constant velocity or at rest. |
Gravity: The force pulling objects to the center of the earth
Normal Force: The force opposing the force of gravity, it pushes
away from the earth.
Push Force: The force of one object pushing another.
Friction: The force of an object dragging. It can only be as strong as the force that it is opposing.
Tension Force: The force along a rope.
Spring Force: The elasticity of a spring; how much a spring wants to return to its original form.
Real World Application:
This example shows a climber on the side of a mountain, repelling down. The forces in this example are the force pull or tension on the rope and the force gravity in the vertical direction. Also, the climber has his foot against the mountain which is creating a friction force that opposes the force of gravity. There is a normal force on his foot from the mountain.
Force Formulas:
The first formula that we learned was for converting between Mass and weight
W=MG
The W in the equation is for weight (expressed in Kg). The M is for Mass (expressed in Newtons). The G is for gravity (Newtons), and it is equal to 10N.
The second formula we learned was for calculating the friction of an object.
Newton's Third Law:
The final law that we learned was Newton's Third Law. It states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that there is always a pair of forces acting oppositely on two interacting objects. For example if a someone pushes a table across the room, the table also pushes the person with equal force.
Monday, October 5, 2015
Texting While Driving Lab Report
Texting and Driving Experiment
Purpose:
The purpose of this experiment was to find the displacement of your car when you send
a text (LOL) to your friend while driving. We did this by choosing a constant speed
that we would be traveling at and what kind of phone we would use to respond,
but everything else was a variable which made the experiment hard.
Raw
Data:
Time for text Speed of car
7.15s 60 mph
8.1s 60 mph
5s 60 mph
Avg. 6.75 60 mph
Graph
Conformation:
This graph shows the relationship between the velocity of the car and the time in which it took to send the text. The times are varied because of our own human inconsistency in the text time. We tried to mitigate this variation by taking an average of all of the trials (6.75 seconds). The velocity in our equation was a constant because we figured the speed limit on the highway should be about 60 mph.
Conclusions:
We
used the equation v=d/t to find the distance in which the car traveled. We
manipulated the equation so we got vt = d. We used a constant velocity of 60
mph, and took an average time (6.75s) for the text to get the final distance of 0.1125
miles. This distance in more understandable terms is 594 feet. While you drive down the interstate, you will move almost 600 feet while sending your “lol” text to a friend.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














